You Decide!

I’m sure there’s an idiot in here somewhere…

Choose your own idiot!

I’ll suggest the topic, you decide who the idiot is.

Keep your doctor handy flowchart

Keep your doctor handy flowchart

Image from hotair

Original Flowchart

The U.S. Congress

Honestly, it’s just easier to nominate them all, and then exclude the few who aren’t idiots.  Specifically, this post is for all the members of Congress who have refused to support the bill requiring 72 hours between a final copy of legislation being available and the beginning of voting for it.

We elected these folks to represent us.  If they aren’t taking the time to read and understand the laws they are creating, exactly who is?  Any legislation that is important enough for the Congress to undertake is important enough to take the time to understand.

Let your representatives know that you’d like them to do their jobs and actually represent you.

Thomas Frank

As much as he may like to believe it, it seems unlikely that all of our troubles have been caused by too little government intervention in our lives.

The stout-hearted defenders of freedom declared that government could never work, sometimes citing examples of misgovernment drawn from periods of conservative rule to make their case. They deplored the prospect of government intrusion into the economy, ignoring the fact that our current troubles are the consequence of government’s withdrawal from the economy.  -Thomas Frank (Liberals and Civility, @WSJ)

Sadly, our current troubles can be more attributed to the meddling of government in the form of the Federal Reserve and its loose monetary policy practices in the 1990’s and 2000’s, which combined with the “pro-housing” forces of government to inflate a housing bubble so big it was able to take out a large portion of the economy when it finally popped.  These arguably had proponents on both sides of the political aisle, but certain members (Barney Frank, anyone?) had more to do with this mess than others.  The biggest failure of the conservatives was a failure to try to reign in this government fueled frenzy when they had the chance in the middle of this decade.

Bill Maher

My first thought was wonderment at how some unknown crank got their stuff published at the Huffington Post.  Then I checked the byline, only to realize it was posted by Bill Maher.  Finally, I wondered if it was satire, but realized that given where it is posted, it’s most likely not.  If it is, bravo, and masterfully done. You have cleverly pointed out the pitfalls that accompany the collectivization of responsibility, and how easily that can lead to meddling in all aspects of a person’s life.  Please let me know and I will nominate myself as replacement idiot of the day.

Maher seems to have jumped the gun.  He is already planning the next steps towards what he feels should be more government (or perhaps a less sinister “public” in his mind) intrusion into the personal lives of all U.S. citizens in the name of reducing the universal expenses associated with health care utopia.  I suppose in his mind it’s OK to replace “You’re broke, so go away” with “You’re fat, so shut up and go away.”

Let me suggest a new rule of my own: You can’t complain about my health if you support health care reform.  Fix the system as you please, but don’t assume that giving away health coverage gives you any say in the things that determine a person’s level of health.

Sebastian Blanco

Blanco has concluded that because the government spends 2.5 times more to “subsidize” fossil fuels than other green energy, we should all fly off the handle and fix this wasteful spending.

However, this ignores the fact that coil, oil, and natural gas represent approximately 85% (see chart) of the energy consumed in the U.S., while the green sources cited in the study represent 7% or less.

Further, according to Blanco:

Just two tax credits – the Foreign Tax Credit and the Credit for Production of Nonconventional Fuels – account for about $30 billion

This means that the evil “subsidies” in question are most likely made up of credits given to companies for taxes they already paid to other foreign governments.  If the companies in question were any other than the horrible, dirty polluters that fuel our economy, this would be (and is) recognized as a fair exemption to avoid double taxation of international corporations.
But by all means, don’t let this stop the uproar, even though “green” energy is already receiving at least 12 times  more “subsidies” than fossil fuels (by proportion of consumption), and the “subsidies” mostly represent standard tax breaks taken by all corporations.

U.S. Energy Consumption, 2002, pie chart

U.S. Energy Consumption, 2002, pie chart

Michael Jacobson (representing the CSPI)

Mr. Jacobson of the CSPI wins the award for today because of his determination that he can decide better than the public he claims to represent what they would like to eat and drink.  Maybe that is true, given that he knows which science is in the public interest, and has no issues installing a blatant agenda into his science.

We all need food, but no one needs soda. Soda is basically liquid candy, providing empty excess calories without needed nutrients. – Mr. Jacobson (@Huffington Post)

Tea parties seem to be all the rage this season, but my guess is that the thing which will finally awaken the full fury of the American people will be when some overzealous politician decides we are ready to pay a  penny per ounce for soda, juice, and other drinks with sugar.  Maybe it won’t happen until Mr. Jacobson comes after the rest of our “candy.”  Then again, perhaps my confidence is misplaced, and we will all be happy to sit by and follow the directions of some third party “consumer advocacy group” to tell us all the things that we don’t need in order to live.  I cannot wait to see what happens when he explains to the nation that nobody needs a reclining chair and a big screen TV.

Site Updates

For now, the site will probably consist of various stories about idiots which are encountered in daily life.  These may be people you know (political figures, celebrities, etc.), or people whose idiocy only the author is aware of.  Every attempt will be made to preserve the anonymity of any idiots who are not already well known figures, while still relaying their stories.  If their idiocy rises to the level that the story alone makes them famous, then perhaps they should evaluate their life decisions.

Eventually, the goal is to include more interactive features, including allowing members of this site to vote on new idiots, and perhaps even a playoff of idiots to determine the grand champion idiot.  Suggestions are welcome, just keep in mind the goal of the site is to discourage idiocy, not to celebrate it.

Hello Everyone!

Welcome to the new Idiot of the Day blog.  The hope is that with a blog, updates will be easier and more organized, and that should allow for more posts and possibly more authors.  This blog is dedicated to pointing out idiocy in all its forms.  Please remember that all posts represent the opinions of the authors, as there is currently no test to determine if a person is an idiot.