Mark Zuckerberg

Apparently, people don’t want privacy anymore.  Zuckerberg has decided that because people use blogs, they will be ok with each and every detail of their lives being published online and mined by anonymous advertisers.  I will admit that some will probably say they wouldn’t care if every detail of their lives are public.  My guess is that their response would change after someone offers to follow them around with an HD camera 24/7, broadcasting all the details of their privacy expunged lives to the internet.

For some reason, Zuckerberg doesn’t seem to understand that just because people share some information online, they may not wish to expose everything.  Based on the photo of him rock-starring it up in full headset gear on stage, he may actually believe in this new paradigm he has seen.  I do hope somebody will offer to chronicle his life, private Facebook board meetings and all, so that he can demonstrate the benefits of a privacy free existence.

Me

I get the feeling that I’m the idiot today.  And yesterday.  And probably for many more days to come.

You may have heard about the Senate plan to ram through healthcare on Christmas Eve.  Perhaps it is the conspiracy theorist in me, but I feel like the current plan for those supporting this bill is to take our current system, which admittedly needs work, and screw it up to the point of complete dysfunction.

They want to super-tax (40%)  “gold-plated” plans, which are really more like brass-plated plans for big companies, and tin-plated plans for small companies or individuals.  This will drive companies to cut benefits well before any magical cost savings appear.

They want to kill tax benefits that allow big companies to pay for their retirees prescriptions, rather than having them participate in the Medicare drug plan.

They want to regulate the private health insurance industry to death.

I could go on and on, but I’ll keep this short.  The crazy person in me says that the reason they want to do this is to drive everyone into the arms of a government health care option (be it Medicare or some nascent public option).  When everything else really is crap, the government alternatives begin to look pretty good.

As much as I don’t like being that crazy paranoid guy, I find myself hoping that this really is their conspiracy.  Because if it is not, it looks to me like they are simply trying to make an even bigger wreck out of our current mess of a system without having any ideas for how to actually fix it.

Rupert Murdoch

Somebody explain the internet to this guy.  He’s obviously too old to realize that search engines drive people to his websites.  Anybody who only wants to read the two sentence google summary of the article was either never going to be his customer, or has decided that the article sucks (and wouldn’t pay for it anyway.)

It was tough to decide, but he wins over Microsoft, who apparently thinks that paying sites for “search content” is going to turn into an economical business model.  Except MSFT is 10 years to late to be able to crush Google via financial competition.

Put the ads on your site, Murdoch, or lock the doors and make people pay to get in.  If you don’t show up in Google’s results, it simply means I’ll click on whichever site does.  Consider search engines to be free advertising.

Nancy Pelosi (and Friends)

Old and Busted: Paying for retirement benefits using future workers taxes

New Hotness: Spending 10 years worth of new taxes in only 7 years

No worries Nancy.  You won’t have to sign up for the new plan.

Adam Kirsch

This nomination is for the ability to so completely miss the point as to make the rest of your premises and conclusions suspect.  In Mr. Kirsch’s review of a new Ayn Rand biography, he references a story about Ms. Rand making a deal to take fewer royalties in exchange for the inclusion of a particular passage of her book, Atlas Shrugged, and then expounds that

Giving up her royalties to preserve her vision is something that no genuine capitalist, and few popular novelists, would have done. (link)

Of course, a true capitalist would welcome the opportunity to arrive at a fair price between two parties in order to complete a satisfactory deal. Contrary to the beliefs of many (possibly even contrary to the beliefs of some who think they understand the Atlas Shrugged philosophy), capitalism does not need to represent the persuit of the dollar above all else.  It simply requires that all parties involved in the deal are free to negotiate the terms as they see fit.  In Ms. Rand’s case, that price appears to have been $.07 per copy of her book in order to preserve this particular speech.  I suspect it was a deal she was quite happy to have the opportunity to make.

Stupid idea? Only if you disagree.

The headline is meant to be a statement of fact, not an endorsement of the idea put forward by Brenda and Robert Vale that people could save the planet by eating their pets.  Chances are that a proponent can be found for even stupid ideas, but the folks who front them usually don’t see them as quite so idiotic.  Of course this particular idea is absurd and the authors are using it mostly as a shock tactic to get people to think of the various ways in which they use resources that are not absolutely essential.

What this book title should do, however, is make people realize the extent to which our modern lifestyles depend upon energy.  In the final analysis, everything we do depends on energy (it’s physics.)  And furthermore, it should point out the kinds of absurd possibilities that are opened up when some third party gets to determine what activities are and are not acceptable usages of energy.  After all, you may feel your pet is a member of the family, but the carbon regulation board may view pets as “non-essential personnel.”

Etymology, please?

Turns out that, at least in Ohio, the founding fathers had the foresight to prevent idiots from deciding our collective future.

No idiot, or insane person, shall be entitled to the privileges of an elector.  Ohio Constitution, Article V Section 6

Now if we could just figure out a sound way to enforce this clause without its being vulnerable to abuse…

Stuck in Toilet guy

Yeah, sure, a diving catch you say?  Stuck up to the elbow?

Union “Standby Time”

The employer doesn’t like it, the employees say they don’t like it, so why does standby time still exist?  Probably because the only thing worse than sitting in a room doing nothing is sitting in a room doing nothing and not getting paid for it.

Sen. Max Baucus

Taxing medical devices to help pay for government funded medical care is one of the most idiotic ideas ever proposed.  How does a 10%, 20%, or 40% (actual number is unknown, but bear with me for a moment) tax on a medical device, of which probably 80%, 90%, or 100% of the cost will be paid for by the revenues from the tax even make sense?  Especially considering the fact that whatever the tax is, 100% of it will result in overall increased costs to medical consumers.

The answer is that the only possible thing this tax may accomplish will be to raise the cost of medicine for those with non-government sponsored insurance (or those who pay out of pocket) in order to fund the cost of medicine for those with government sponsored insurance.  Furthermore, as more people migrate to government sponsored insurance (because of the added taxes which are subsidized for the government sponsored plans), the tax will eventually become an impotent ruse which results in no net revenue, but merely serves to inflate the total cost of all medical goods.  The government subsidized insurance plans will use the funds collected by the tax simply to pay the tax.

*Extra Credit: Replace “medical device(s)” with “Gold-plated health insurance plans” in the above to determine the mechanism by which the Baucus option will eventually drive everybody to government funded health care.  (Caveat: if the government options include enough waiting lists and rationed care, the rich may still choose to buy private insurance in order to make sure they get the health care they need in a timely fashion, thus allowing a niche private insurance industry to remain indefinitely.)